[theqoo] SINGLE'S INFERNO'S PARTICIPANT'S STATEMENT ON HIS SCHOOL VIOLENCE PAST

This is Kook Dongho.

I would like to correct false information.

The claims currently being made unilaterally by a certain individual are not based on facts at all, and I clearly state that I have no connection whatsoever to those incidents. False information is causing serious harm to me and to people around me.

I have never been involved in or stood by while a third party engaged in actions such as “hitting someone’s head with a badminton racket, pressing someone’s face onto a chair, or putting glue on someone’s belongings.”
I did not date someone named Moon Y*Hye during middle school. I even question whether such a person exists. I have never attended that academy.
During middle school, I was in my early teens. It is not true that at that age I brought a cake, knelt down, and confessed in front of many people. I have never done such a thing. I do not confess carelessly to anyone.
I believe fact-checking should always come first. Contrary to claims that I quit my accounting job and became an influencer, I am still working at an accounting firm and have never left my profession.
These arguments are not based on facts. The other party seems to be framing things by assuming I won’t remember and forming conclusions in advance before presenting their logic. Even weak evidence can appear convincing if repeated consistently and supported by others, and I believe they are taking advantage of this vulnerability.

Therefore, if I were to make the same kind of claims without evidence, I could become the victim and the other party the perpetrator.

If the claims being made were actually things I did in the past, it would be right for me to acknowledge them and apologize. However, listing unverified allegations and consistently steering them toward promoting a certain narrative is deeply regrettable. I request an apology for defaming me with stories not based on facts, and I ask that the spread of false information be stopped.

original post: here

1. That's a lawyer he's against, of course she prepared everything before starting all this

2. First of all, I think the lawyer is more in the right

3. Seriously do you think she'd start something like that against someone who was just standing still?

If this man turns out to be right, what is there to gain from the woman's side for exposing him?

4. Why are people keeping things neutral here?

5. We need to listen to both side, we can't just blindly follow a single side

6. Let's keep things neutral

7. Hmmm

8. Let's see how things unfold

9. Do you really think a lawyer will speak up when there's nothing there?

10. I bet the lawyer's side will release something too